RB2 By Committee: PPR - Footballguys

Jeff Pasquino's RB2 By Committee: PPR - Footballguys Jeff Pasquino Published 08/14/2018

Over the past few years, there have been several very popular articles written by myself and our very own Chase Stuart that look at an interesting approach to building a fantasy team with late value picks. Based upon the theory of using both Strength of Schedule ("SOS") and taking two players as a combination to build one very good player, Chase has discussed both Team Defense by Committee ("TDBC") and Quarterback by Committee ("QBBC") as a general fantasy league strategy. In general, I think that this is a wise move because very early on in fantasy drafts there are a ton of RB and WR prospects to go after to build a great team. While there are a few studs at quarterback and also a few choice defenses, I do not see a huge need in leagues to pursue either too hard in the beginning stages of a fantasy draft.

So with this in mind, I started to think about what else can be done with the committee approach. Tight end? Perhaps. Wide receiver? A possibility, but it might be better to look at third wide receiver options than any other option. What about running back? Hmmm, that's really intriguing. What if you could grab two running backs later in the draft that could combine to perform on an RB2 - or even RB1 - level, based solely on their current projections and their schedule? Now we're talking. This really got my attention, so I went after this one first. Let's take a look at how I went about this and then we can digest and discuss the results.

THE GROUND(GAME) RULES

So how to begin? Defenses and quarterbacks are relatively easy to committee together. There's usually only one quarterback and certainly only one team defense per NFL club, so the approach is pretty simple as far as picking out which players/teams to try and pair up. When it comes to running backs, the line is not quite so easy to draw, but I needed some basis to pick which players it made sense to try and combine for a decent committee. I decided that I would use the following criteria to decide which players to start with for evaluating:

CRITERIA #1 - RB25 AND BEYOND

This seems pretty simple. If we want to have a duo that puts up RB2 numbers, that means we want RB24 or better production - else we would just draft RB24 (Mark Ingram) or higher and forget the whole idea. So here is the list of players with which I started, based on their Average Draft Position (ADP):

ADP Rank
Running Back
ADP Rank
Running Back
RB25
RB38
RB26
RB39
RB27
RB40
RB28
RB41
RB29
RB42
RB30
RB43
Ty Montgomery
RB31
RB44
D'Onta Foreman
RB32
RB45
RB33
RB46
RB34
RB47
RB35
RB48
RB36
RB49
RB37
RB50

Table 1: Running Backs RB25-RB50 Based on PPR ADP

Great, now we have 26 guys to pair up and see how they do. That makes 325 potential committees, so there had better be a decent one (or several, we hope) out of all of those couplets. Now, before I go over the method of how to pair them up and the results, we need one more rule:

CRITERIA #2 - NO MORE THAN ONE RB FROM ROUND 5 AND ONE FROM ROUND 6

This could get tricky here, but understand the overall goal. The point of RB2BC is to free up the first four rounds of your fantasy draft to pursue three receivers after grabbing a stud running back in Round 1. This also gives you the flexibility of grabbing two receivers and a stud quarterback or tight end, depending on your personal preference, or even to get RB2 and have the RB2BC be your RB3. Flexibility is the name of the game here. We all want value in our drafts, and having the ability to grab two running backs in Rounds 5 and 6 to act as our RB2BC gives us that ability.

Here is the good news - nearly all the running backs on the list above has an ADP that is Round 6 or higher (later), but several backs fall in the Round 5-6 range that will be of interest. We will have to keep that in mind when we look at the results because it would not make sense to expect to get two Round 5 or Round 6 running backs in one of these combinations based on their ADP.

So what do we do now to figure out some running back pairs?

CRITERIA #3 - USE FOOTBALLGUYS' RB STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE

This sounds pretty simple, doesn't it? Just take the running back strength of schedule to figure out when certain players are more likely to score well. What I did is similar to what the Projections Dominator and Draft Dominator do for you - take the projected fantasy points and slice them up over 16 weeks based on the strength of schedule. I call this result the distributed fantasy points for each back.

After I had all 26 running backs with distributed fantasy points on a weekly basis, I just compared all of the possible running back pairs to find the best duos for RB2BC. So here we are - time for some results.

Rank
Running Back 1
Running Back 2
Value
1
186.9
2
186.4
3
185.4
4
185.1
5
184.2
6
184.1
7
183.9
8
183.3
9
183.2
10
182.2
11
182.2
12
182.2
13
182.1
14
182.0
15
181.6
16
181.6
17
181.6
18
181.5
19
181.4
20
181.2
21
181.1
22
180.9
23
180.8
24
180.8
25
180.2
26
180.1
27
180.1
28
180.0
29
180.0
30
180.0
31
180.0
32
179.9
33
179.7
34
179.6
35
179.5
36
179.4
37
179.4
38
179.3
39
179.1
40
178.9
41
178.9
42
178.5
43
178.0
44
177.9
45
177.8
46
177.7
47
177.3
48
177.3
49
176.9
50
176.8
51
176.8
52
176.8
53
176.7
54
176.5
55
176.4
56
176.3
57
176.3
58
176.2
59
176.0
60
175.8
61
175.7
62
175.0
63
175.0
64
174.9
65
174.9
66
174.9
67
174.8
68
174.8
69
174.5
70
174.5
71
174.4
72
174.4
73
174.4
74
174.3
75
174.1
76
174.1
77
174.1
78
174.1
79
173.9
80
173.7
81
173.6
82
173.5
83
173.5
84
173.4
85
173.3
86
173.2
87
173.1
88
173.0
89
172.9
90
172.9
91
172.8
92
172.7
93
172.7
94
172.6
95
D'Onta Foreman
172.6
96
172.6
97
172.4
98
172.4
99
172.4
100
172.4
101
172.3
102
172.3
103
172.3
104
172.2
105
172.1
106
D'Onta Foreman
172.1
107
171.9
108
171.7
109
D'Onta Foreman
171.4
110
171.4
111
Ty Montgomery
171.3
112
171.1
113
171.0
114
170.8
115
170.7
116
170.7
117
170.6
118
170.6
119
170.5
120
Ty Montgomery
170.3
121
170.3
122
170.2
123
170.1
124
170.1
125
170.0
126
169.8
127
169.7
128
169.6
129
169.6
130
169.6
131
169.5
132
Ty Montgomery
169.4
133
169.2
134
D'Onta Foreman
169.2
135
Ty Montgomery
169.2
136
Ty Montgomery
169.1
137
169.0
138
169.0
139
168.9
140
168.8
141
168.8
142
168.8
143
D'Onta Foreman
168.8
144
168.7
145
168.6
146
168.5
147
168.2
148
D'Onta Foreman
167.9
149
167.9
150
167.7
151
167.7
152
167.5
153
Ty Montgomery
167.5
154
Ty Montgomery
167.5
155
167.3
Photos provided by Imagn Images
Share This Article

Featured Articles