Trevor Lawrence: Pedigree versus Performance

Jason Wood's Trevor Lawrence: Pedigree versus Performance Jason Wood Published 07/27/2022

Redraft content is part of the PRO package for Footballguys Premium Subscriptions. We're making this preview available so you can see the edge these subscribers are getting. Sign up here.

The Spotlight Series

A Footballguys Spotlight is an in-depth look at a player. His plusses and minuses are examined, and we give you our bottom-line stance on his 2022 prospects. If a player listed below doesn't yet have a link, don't worry. It's coming soon.


Don't Believe the Hype?

Trevor Lawrence is one of the most divisive players in the player pool this year, and his performance in 2022 will be a fascinating test case of pedigree versus performance. Those who believe in historical analogs will undoubtedly avoid Lawrence because his rookie season wasn’t just bad; it was one of the worst campaigns in modern NFL history. On the other hand, some will be inclined to discount last year’s disastrous showing and fall back on Lawrence’s pristine pedigree. It’s not very often we see a quarterback so widely assigned a “can’t miss” label perform as poorly as Lawrence did in 2021. Is he worth taking the leap this year? Probably not, even though you’ll try hard to talk yourselves into it.


The Pedigree

Most NFL players were elite at lower levels, but rarely has someone been as well-regarded as Lawrence. In terms of pre-NFL bonafides, he’s unimpeachable. He became a starter as a freshman at Cartersville High School in Georgia, and led the team to a 52-2 record, including 41-0 in his final three years. He led the team to four divisional titles and two state championships. Lawrence threw for 13,902 yards and 161 passing touchdowns, breaking the Georgia records previously held by Deshaun Watson. Not only did he have gaudy numbers and a nearly perfect record, but he also had prototypical size and perfect mechanics. Lawrence was not only a coveted recruit; he stands to this day as one of the highest-rated prospects, clocking in with a 99.99 rating in the 247Sports Composite.

We all know Lawrence chose to play at Clemson (following Watson’s footsteps), and he took over as the starter just five games into his true freshman season. The Tigers won the National Championship, making Lawrence the first true freshman to ever start and win the title. In three years, Watson led the Tigers to a 34-2 record, two National Championship appearances, and put up elite numbers while comporting himself on and off the field in a mature, compelling manner.

There haven’t been many quarterbacks who were this heralded early on and never faltered in living up to expectations. Lawrence becoming the first-overall pick to the Jaguars a year ago was a foregone conclusion.

The Performance

The Jaguars have been a franchise without an identity for most of Shad Khan’s tenure as the team owner. Last year, the excitement for a breakthrough was palpable. Khan has lured Hall of Fame college super coach Urban Meyer to the NFL. Then they added Lawrence first overall and paired him with Clemson teammate and offensive engine Travis Etienne. The Jaguars weren’t going to win a Super Bowl in 2021, but surely it was the start of something great, right?

WRONG.

Few hires have gone as badly as quickly as Urban Meyer’s did in Jacksonville. He was ill-prepared for the NFL rigors, and his “my way or the highway” approach, which worked well in college when the kids had no agency in their own lives, was ineffective when dealing with professional adults making millions of dollars.

The team finished with a league-worst 3-14 record, and the ineptitude spanned every facet of the game.

  • Record – 3-14 (32nd)
  • Points Scored – 253 (32nd)
  • Points Allowed – 457 (28th)
  • Turnover Percentage – 15.7% (31st)
  • Scoring Drive Conversion Rate – 26.4% (32nd)
  • Turnovers Created Rate – 5.2% (32nd)
  • Turnovers Forced – 9 (32nd)

Unfortunately, nothing went right for the team, including Lawrence’s performance. Even if you account for Lawrence being forced into the starting lineup as a rookie with an understaffed roster, you still can’t look at his 2021 season and find any statistical silver lining.

Lawrence was one of the worst quarterbacks in the NFL last season:

  • QBR (33.5) – 28th out of 31 qualifiers
  • Passer Rating (71.9) – 30th out of 31
  • Completion Rate (59.6%) – 29th out of 31
  • Yards per Attempt (6.0) – 31st out of 31
  • Touchdown Rate (2.0%) – 31st out of 31
  • Interception Rate (2.4%) – 24th out of 31

Fantasy managers understand Lawrence was bad, but they’re seemingly willing to give him a pass on the season because of the dysfunctional environment Meyer fostered. But I would argue optimistic fantasy managers don’t fully grasp the magnitude of Lawrence’s struggles, historically speaking.

A Study of Rookie Starters

Since 1992 (30 Years), there have been 76 rookie quarterbacks with at least 200 pass attempts.

TABLE: Rookie Quarterbacks with 200+ Pass Attempts, Sorted by Passing Yards (1992-2021)

<
Already a subscriber?

Continue reading this content with a 100% FREE Insider account.

By signing up and providing us with your email address, you're agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive emails from Tennessee.
Photos provided by Imagn Images

More by Jason Wood

 

The Top NFL Free Agents Still Looking for Work

Jason Wood

Our Jason Wood runs down the top options for teams looking for veteran additions.

04/10/25 Read More
 

Reassessing the QB Situation entering Free Agency

Jason Wood

Looking at the NFL teams in need of a starting QB

03/10/25 Read More
 

Tight End Rankings: Players I'm High and Low On

Jason Wood

An early look at where my tight end rankings differ from the industry consensus.

02/21/25 Read More
 

Running Back Rankings: Players I'm High and Low On

Jason Wood

An early look at where my running back rankings differ from the industry consensus.

02/20/25 Read More
 

Wide Receiver Rankings: Players I'm High and Low On

Jason Wood

An early look at where my wide receiver rankings differ from the industry consensus.

02/19/25 Read More
 

Quarterback Rankings: Players I'm High and Low On

Jason Wood

An early look at where my quarterback rankings differ from the industry consensus.

02/18/25 Read More
Rank Player Year Team Gms Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TDs Ints TD% Int% NetTD-Int Rate Sk% Yds/Att ANY/A
1 Andrew Luck 2012 IND 16 339 627 54.1% 4,374 23 18 3.7% 2.9% 0.80% 76.5 6.1% 6.976 5.656
2 Justin Herbert 2020 LAC 15 396 595 66.6% 4,336 31 10 5.2% 1.7% 3.53% 98.3 5.1% 7.287 6.839
3 Cam Newton 2011 CAR 16 310 517 60.0% 4,051 21 17 4.1% 3.3% 0.77% 84.5 6.3% 7.836 6.243
4 Jameis Winston 2015 TAM 16 312 535 58.3% 4,042 22 15 4.1% 2.8% 1.31% 84.2 4.8% 7.555 6.436
5 Mac Jones 2021 NWE 17 352 521 67.6% 3,801 22 13 4.2% 2.5% 1.73% 92.5 5.1% 7.296 6.220
6 Carson Wentz 2016 PHI 16 379 607 62.4% 3,782 16 14 2.6% 2.3% 0.33% 79.3 5.2% 6.231 5.092
7 Peyton Manning 1998 IND 16 326 575 56.7% 3,739 26 28 4.5% 4.9% -0.35% 71.2 3.7% 6.503 4.841
8 Baker Mayfield 2018 CLE 14 310 486 63.8% 3,725 27 14 5.6% 2.9% 2.67% 93.7 4.9% 7.665 6.775
9 Kyler Murray 2019 ARI 16 349 542 64.4% 3,722 20 12 3.7% 2.2% 1.48% 87.4 8.1% 6.867 5.547
10 Dak Prescott 2016 DAL 16 311 459 67.8% 3,667 23 4 5.0% 0.9% 4.14% 104.9 5.2% 7.989 7.860
11 Trevor Lawrence 2021 JAX 17 359 602 59.6% 3,641 12 17 2.0% 2.8% -0.83% 71.9 5.0% 6.048 4.539
12 Sam Bradford 2010 STL 16 354 590 60.0% 3,512 18 15 3.1% 2.5% 0.51% 76.5 5.4% 5.953 4.732
13 Matt Ryan 2008 ATL 16 265 434 61.1% 3,440 16 11 3.7% 2.5% 1.15% 87.7 3.8% 7.926 7.009
14 Andy Dalton 2011 CIN 16 300 516 58.1% 3,398 20 13 3.9% 2.5% 1.36% 80.4 4.4% 6.585 5.654
15 Brandon Weeden 2012 CLE 15 297 517 57.4% 3,385 14 17 2.7% 3.3% -0.58% 72.6 5.1% 6.547 4.980
16 Ryan Tannehill 2012 MIA 16 282 484 58.3% 3,294 12 13 2.5% 2.7% -0.21% 76.1 6.7% 6.806 5.231
17 Gardner Minshew II 2019 JAX 14 285 470 60.6% 3,271 21 6 4.5% 1.3% 3.19% 91.2 6.6% 6.960 6.435
18 Derek Carr 2014 OAK 16 348 599 58.1% 3,270 21 12 3.5% 2.0% 1.50% 76.6 3.9% 5.459 4.817
19 Robert Griffin III 2012 WAS 15 258 393 65.6% 3,200 20 5 5.1% 1.3% 3.82% 102.4 7.1% 8.142 7.466
20 Russell Wilson 2012 SEA 16 252 393 64.1% 3,118 26 10 6.6% 2.5% 4.07% 100.0 7.7% 7.934 7.007
21 Geno Smith 2013 NYJ 16 247 443 55.8% 3,046 12 21 2.7% 4.7% -2.03% 66.5 8.8% 6.876 4.169
22 Daniel Jones 2019 NYG 13 284 459 61.9% 3,027 24 12 5.2% 2.6% 2.61% 87.7 7.6% 6.595 5.376
23 Joe Flacco 2008 BAL 16 257 428 60.0% 2,971 14 12 3.3% 2.8% 0.47% 80.3 7.0% 6.942 5.293
24 Chris Weinke 2001 CAR 15 293 540 54.3% 2,931 11 19 2.0% 3.5% -1.48% 62.0 4.6% 5.428 3.744
25 Teddy Bridgewater 2014 MIN 13 259 402 64.4% 2,919 14 12 3.5% 3.0% 0.50% 85.2 8.8% 7.261 5.465
26 Blake Bortles 2014 JAX 14 280 475 58.9% 2,908 11 17 2.3% 3.6% -1.26% 69.5 10.4% 6.122 3.808
27 DeShone Kizer 2017 CLE 15 255 476 53.6% 2,894 11 22 2.3% 4.6% -2.31% 60.5 7.4% 6.080 3.693
28 Sam Darnold 2018 NYJ 13 239 414 57.7% 2,865 17 15 4.1% 3.6% 0.48% 77.6 6.8% 6.920 5.239
29 Rick Mirer 1993 SEA 16 274 486 56.4% 2,833 12 17 2.5% 3.5% -1.03% 67.0 8.8% 5.829 3.889
30 Byron Leftwich 2003 JAX 15 239 418 57.2% 2,819 14 16 3.3% 3.8% -0.48% 73.0 4.3% 6.744 5.238
31 Marcus Mariota 2015 TEN 12 230 370 62.2% 2,818 19 10 5.1% 2.7% 2.43% 91.5 9.3% 7.616 6.103
32 Kerry Collins 1995 CAR 15 214 433 49.4% 2,717 14 19 3.2% 4.4% -1.15% 61.9 5.3% 6.275 4.359
33 Joe Burrow 2020 CIN 10 264 404 65.3% 2,688 13 5 3.2% 1.2% 1.98% 89.8 7.3% 6.653 5.716
34 Davis Mills 2021 HOU 13 263 394 66.8% 2,664 16 10 4.1% 2.5% 1.52% 88.8 7.3% 6.761 5.478
35 Ben Roethlisberger 2004 PIT 14 196 295 66.4% 2,621 17 11 5.8% 3.7% 2.03% 98.1 9.2% 8.885 6.932
36 Mike Glennon 2013 TAM 13 247 416 59.4% 2,608 19 9 4.6% 2.2% 2.40% 83.9 8.8% 6.269 4.976
37 David Carr 2002 HOU 16 233 444 52.5% 2,592 9 15 2.0% 3.4% -1.35% 62.8 14.6% 5.838 3.242
38 Matt Leinart 2006 ARI 12 214 377 56.8% 2,547 11 12 2.9% 3.2% -0.27% 74.0 5.3% 6.756 5.198
39 Tony Banks 1996 STL 14 192 368 52.2% 2,544 15 15 4.1% 4.1% 0.00% 71.0 11.5% 6.913 4.478
40 Drew Bledsoe 1993 NWE 13 214 429 49.9% 2,494 15 15 3.5% 3.5% 0.00% 65.0 3.6% 5.814 4.539
41 Tim Couch 1999 CLE 15 223 399 55.9% 2,447 15 13 3.8% 3.3% 0.50% 73.2 12.3% 6.133 3.963
42 Mark Sanchez 2009 NYJ 15 196 364 53.8% 2,444 12 20 3.3% 5.5% -2.20% 63.0 6.7% 6.714 4.074
43 Zach Wilson 2021 NYJ 13 213 383 55.6% 2,334 9 11 2.3% 2.9% -0.52% 69.7 10.3% 6.094 3.862
44 Joey Harrington 2002 DET 14 215 429 50.1% 2,294 12 16 2.8% 3.7% -0.93% 59.9 1.8% 5.347 3.979
45 Josh Rosen 2018 ARI 14 217 393 55.2% 2,278 11 14 2.8% 3.6% -0.76% 66.7 10.3% 5.796 3.534
46 Matthew Stafford 2009 DET 10 201 377 53.3% 2,267 13 20 3.4% 5.3% -1.86% 61.0 6.0% 6.013 3.636
47 Blaine Gabbert 2011 JAX 15 210 413 50.8% 2,214 12 11 2.9% 2.7% 0.24% 65.4 8.8% 5.361 3.678
48 Jake Plummer 1997 ARI 10 157 296 53.0% 2,203 15 15 5.1% 5.1% 0.00% 73.1 14.9% 7.443 4.417
49 Vince Young 2006 TEN 15 184 357 51.5% 2,199 12 13 3.4% 3.6% -0.28% 66.7 6.5% 6.160 4.516
50 Mitchell Trubisky 2017 CHI 12 196 330 59.4% 2,193 7 7 2.1% 2.1% 0.00% 77.5 8.6% 6.645 5.047
51 Charlie Batch 1998 DET 12 173 303 57.1% 2,178 11 6 3.6% 2.0% 1.65% 83.5 10.9% 7.188 5.606
52 Josh Allen 2018 BUF 12 169 320 52.8% 2,074 10 12 3.1% 3.8% -0.63% 67.9 8.0% 6.481 4.371
53 EJ Manuel 2013 BUF 10 180 306 58.8% 1,972 11 9 3.6% 2.9% 0.65% 77.7 8.4% 6.444 4.874
54 Justin Fields 2021 CHI 12 159 270 58.9% 1,870 7 10 2.6% 3.7% -1.11% 73.2 11.8% 6.926 4.235
55 Kyle Orton 2005 CHI 15 190 368 51.6% 1,869 9 13 2.4% 3.5% -1.09% 59.7 7.5% 5.079 3.201
56 Josh Freeman 2009 TAM 10 158 290 54.5% 1,855 10 18 3.4% 6.2% -2.76% 59.8 6.5% 6.397 3.687
57 Christian Ponder 2011 MIN 11 158 291 54.3% 1,853 13 13 4.5% 4.5% 0.00% 70.1 9.3% 6.368 4.249
58 Tua Tagovailoa 2020 MIA 10 186 290 64.1% 1,814 11 5 3.8% 1.7% 2.07% 87.1 6.5% 6.255 5.397
59 Deshaun Watson 2017 HOU 7 126 204 61.8% 1,699 19 8 9.3% 3.9% 5.39% 103.0 8.5% 8.328 7.188
60 Nick Foles 2012 PHI 7 161 265 60.8% 1,699 6 5 2.3% 1.9% 0.38% 79.1 7.0% 6.411 5.133
61 Bruce Gradkowski 2006 TAM 13 177 328 54.0% 1,661 9 9 2.7% 2.7% 0.00% 65.9 7.1% 5.064 3.654
62 Heath Shuler 1994 WAS 11