Quarterback By Committee 2015

Chase Stuart's Quarterback By Committee 2015 Chase Stuart Published 08/14/2015

This is the twelfth straight season that Footballguys.com has published its annual Quarterback By Commitee article.  For those fantasy players who like to wait on drafting their quarterback while stocking their team at the other positions, this is the article for you. 

Last year, the recommended approach was selecting Jay Cutler (ADP of QB11) and Eli Manning (ADP of QB22), and pairing them based on pre-season strength of schedule.  If you did just that -- and stuck to those preseason projections (other than the one week Cutler was benched and would have been the recommended play) -- your quarterback would have amassed 4,514 passing yards, 34 TDs, 13 INTs, and 103 rushing yards with one touchdown.  That comes out to 386.4 fantasy points (excluding week 17, and using a scoring system of 1 point per 20 yards passing, 5 points per passing TD, -2 points per INT, 1 point per 10 yards rushing, and 6 points per rushing TD), which would have ranked just outside of the top five (and behind Brees and Roethlisberger) among quarterback production.

The general rule for QBBC fans is that the first seven rounds of your draft should be used to assemble a wealth of talent at running back, wide receiver, and, if the draft unfolds in such a way, tight end. By going the QBBC route, you can save those high picks in your draft and still get solid fantasy production by grabbing two QBs who face bad defenses nearly every week of the year. That's what the QBBC system is all about.

Of course, in some leagues, great quarterbacks are available late into the middle rounds of the drafts, so it's important to know your league.  But in general, I like to promote the quarterback-by-committee approach, and wait even longer and implement this strategy.

The first key, of course, is to rank the defenses. I always start by adjusting last season's data on defenses for strength of schedule. I started with the adjusted FP rankings for each defense listed in the Rearview QB article. Then, I made some adjustments to the defenses based on their efficiency numbers from 2014 and what's happened since the end of last season. The table below lists my rating for defenses for fantasy quarterbacks, listed from the toughest (Seattle) to the easiest (Washington).  Quarterbacks facing a team from the state of Washington should expect to produce about four fantasy points fewer than against an average defense, while passers facing a team from the city of Washington will be projected to score about 3.5 more points than against an average defense.

RkDefENSEGrade
1 Seattle Seahawks -4
2t Buffalo Bills -3
2t Kansas City Chiefs -3
2t New York Jets -3
5t Cincinnati Bengals -2.5
5t Minnesota Vikings -2.5
7t St. Louis Rams -1
7t Miami Dolphins -1
7t Cleveland Browns -1
10t Carolina Panthers -0.5
10t Green Bay Packers -0.5
10t Detroit Lions -0.5
13t Baltimore Ravens 0
13t New England Patriots 0
13t Houston Texans 0
16t Oakland Raiders 0.5
16t Atlanta Falcons 0.5
16t Tennessee Titans 0.5
16t Dallas Cowboys 0.5
16t San Diego Chargers 0.5
16t Tampa Bay Buccaneers 0.5
16t Denver Broncos 0.5
23t New Orleans Saints 1
23t San Francisco 49ers 1
23t Jacksonville Jaguars 1
26t Indianapolis Colts 1.5
26t Arizona Cardinals 1.5
28t Pittsburgh Steelers 2
28t New York Giants 2
30 Chicago Bears 2.5
31 Philadelphia Eagles 3
32 Washington Redskins 3.5

The main key to the QBBC philosophy is to identify which defenses should rank in the bottom quarter of the league when it comes to stopping quarterbacks. Washington, Chicago, and New York were juicy matchups for fantasy quarterbacks last year, and project as similarly enticing in 2015. Meanwhile, teams like Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Indianapolis have questionable defenses and offenses that are likely to bring about shootouts -- which is great if you have the other team's quarterback.  The Cardinals are a sneaky good matchup: Arizona ranked 24th against QBs last year, and the defense seems likely to struggle again this year after turning over the front seven and losing Antonio Cromartie and Todd Bowles to the Jets.

Once we rank the defenses, it's easy to figure out which QB pairings work based on schedule. When the quarterback is home, his opponents gets a +0.3 adjustment, so a quarterback hosting the Eagles receives a score of +3.3.  When that quarterback is on the road, adjustment is 0.3 in the other direction, so playing in Philadelphia is worth +2.7. Below is a list of all 496 possible combinations. These are ranked from most favorable to least, with strength of schedule being the only determining factor.  The top combination here features Matt Ryan (Atlanta) and Robert Griffin III III (Washington), and together, they would be expected to score 26.8 points more than they would if they combined to have a perfectly average schedule.

RkComboPTSRkComboPTSRkComboPTSRkComboPTSRkComboPTS
1 ATL-WAS 26.8 101 BUF-SEA 18.7 201 HOU-NO 15.1 301 CHI-SEA 11.4 401 BAL-SD 6.8
2 NE-TB 26.8 102 IND-NYG 18.7 202 SD-WAS 15.1 302 HOU-STL 11.3 402 DEN-KC 6.8
3 CAR-NYG 26.5 103 CHI-NO 18.6 203 MIA-SD 15 303 CHI-HOU 11.3 403 JAX-PIT 6.8
4 ATL-TB 26 104 CAR-IND 18.6 204 ATL-DEN 15 304 NE-SD 11.3 404 DEN-TEN 6.8
5 PHI-TB 26 105 CLE-PHI 18.6 205 DEN-NYJ 15 305 JAX-SD 11.3 405 STL-TB 6.8
6 NYG-TB 25.9 106 BAL-NE 18.5 206 BAL-DEN 14.9 306 CIN-SF 11.2 406 DET-PIT 6.7
7 CAR-NE 25.8 107 NYG-STL 18.5 207 JAX-NE 14.9 307 DET-IND 11.2 407 DET-GB 6.6
8 CAR-PHI 25.8 108 ATL-DET 18.5 208 MIN-SD 14.8 308 CHI-DET 11.2 408 CIN-MIA 6.5
9 NYJ-TB 25.8 109 MIA-PHI 18.5 209 MIN-PIT 14.8 309 ARI-CIN 11.2 409 BUF-OAK 6.5
10 ARI-TB 25.3 110 DEN-TB 18.5 210 ARI-NE 14.8 310 CLE-DET 11.1 410 OAK-SF 6.4
11 BUF-NYG 25.3 111 MIA-NE 18.3 211 HOU-NE 14.8 311 BAL-PHI 11.1 411 GB-HOU 6.4
12 NO-TB 25 112 STL-WAS 18.3 212 SEA-WAS 14.8 312 BUF-CIN 11.1 412 CIN-CLE 6.4
13 ATL-CAR 24.7 113 ATL-CLE 18 213 ARI-MIA 14.7 313 JAX-TEN 11 413 CIN-TEN 6.4
14 CAR-NO 24.6 114 CAR-STL 18 214 BUF-GB 14.7 314 ARI-DEN 11 414 DEN-DET 6.3
15 MIA-TB 23.9 115 DEN-WAS 18 215 DET-MIN 14.6 315 SF-TEN 11 415 BAL-PIT 6.3
16 DAL-MIA 23.7 116 ATL-BAL 17.9 216 DAL-SD 14.6 316 SD-SEA 10.9 416 IND-OAK 6.3
17 NO-WAS 23.5 117 CAR-JAX 17.8 217 BAL-NO 14.5 317 DET-OAK 10.8 417 DEN-IND 6.2
18 BUF-TB 23.5 118 MIN-WAS 17.8 218 DAL-NE 14.4 318 SEA-STL 10.8 418 GB-SD 6.1
19 NO-NYJ 23.2 119 NE-SEA 17.8 219 BUF-MIA 14.4 319 PIT-STL 10.8 419 CHI-JAX 6.1
20 DAL-NO 23.2 120 SD-TB 17.8 220 MIA-STL 14.3 320 DET-SF 10.7 420 HOU-SD 6.1
21 CAR-SF 23 121 IND-MIA 17.7 221 NO-SD 14.3 321 ARI-JAX 10.6 421 ARI-SF 6
22 GB-TB 23 122 ATL-CHI 17.7 222 DEN-STL 14.3 322 NE-SF 10.6 422 ARI-SD 5.8
23 NYG-PHI 23 123 GB-NYJ 17.7 223 DAL-KC 14.3 323 CLE-NE 10.6 423 CHI-OAK 5.8
24 DET-TB 22.9 124 CAR-CLE 17.5 224 HOU-NYJ 14.3 324 IND-SEA 10.6 424 ARI-PIT 5.8
25 BUF-NE 22.8 125 CIN-NO 17.5 225 NYJ-SEA 14.1 325 MIN-OAK 10.5 425 GB-PIT 5.7
26 NE-WAS 22.8 126 CIN-TB 17.5 226 STL-TEN 14.1 326 JAX-SF 10.5 426 HOU-JAX 5.7
27 NYJ-WAS 22.5 127 IND-PHI 17.5 227 CAR-TEN 14.1 327 ARI-IND 10.4 427 SD-TEN 5.7
28 HOU-TB 22.5 128 JAX-NYJ 17.5 228 CIN-NE 14 328 DET-NE 10.4 428 CLE-OAK 5.6
29 ATL-NYG 22.5 129 MIN-SF 17.4 229 BAL-WAS 13.9 329 ARI-GB 10.4 429 CHI-SF 5.3
30 NE-PHI 22.4 130 CIN-DAL 17.4 230 BUF-HOU 13.9 330 GB-NE 10.2 430 OAK-PIT 5.2
31 ATL-NO 22.2 131 DET-NYJ 17.3 231 ATL-KC 13.8 331 CAR-CIN 10.2 431 CIN-KC 5
32 CAR-WAS 22.2 132 GB-WAS 17.2 232 IND-NE 13.8 332 IND-KC 10.1 432 HOU-SF 4.9
33 ATL-MIN 22.2 133 PHI-SF 17.2 233 BAL-BUF 13.8 333 JAX-SEA 10 433 DAL-TB 4.9
34 NO-PHI 22.2 134 CIN-PHI 17.2 234 ARI-ATL 13.7 334 BAL-TEN 10 434 DEN-SD 4.7
35 MIA-WAS 22.1 135 ARI-DAL 17.1 235 NYG-TEN 13.7 335 ARI-TEN 10 435 HOU-OAK 4.6
36 PHI-STL 22.1 136 DET-WAS 17.1 236 PIT-SEA 13.6 336 CHI-MIA 10 436 DET-JAX 4.6
37 NYG-WAS 22 137 SD-STL 17.1 237 NYJ-SD 13.6 337 BUF-CHI 10 437 CIN-MIN 4.5
38 BUF-NO 22 138 DAL-JAX 17.1 238 NYG-SD 13.6 338 CHI-IND 10 438 CAR-NYJ 4.4
39 DAL-NYJ 22 139 NYJ-STL 17.1 239 ARI-STL 13.5 339 MIN-SEA 9.8 439 CLE-SEA 4.1
40 CAR-DET 21.9 140 ATL-BUF 17 240 CHI-DAL 13.5 340 OAK-TEN 9.8 440 PIT-SD 4.1
41 ATL-NE 21.8 141 CAR-CHI 17 241 ARI-NYJ 13.5 341 GB-IND 9.7 441 BAL-CLE 4
42 PHI-SEA 21.8 142 DAL-DEN 17 242 JAX-STL 13.4 342 BAL-JAX 9.7 442 CLE-STL 3.8
43 JAX-TB 21.8 143 DAL-IND 17 243 CHI-STL 13.3 343 CIN-STL 9.7 443 OAK-SD 3.8
44 CAR-DAL 21.5 144 DET-STL 16.9 244 CLE-WAS 13.3 344 BAL-CIN 9.7 444 CLE-SF 3.2
45 DAL-MIN 21.5 145 ATL-TEN 16.9 245 NYJ-OAK 13.2 345 CIN-HOU 9.7 445 CAR-MIA 2.9
46 ATL-DAL 21.5 146 GB-STL 16.8 246 ARI-CHI 13.2 346 CHI-KC 9.7 446 PHI-WAS 2.8
47 MIA-NYG 21.3 147 KC-PHI 16.8 247 ARI-BUF 13.2 347 ARI-OAK 9.6 447 NO-NYG 2.7
48 IND-TB 21.3 148 BUF-DAL 16.8 248 DET-MIA 13.1 348 BUF-PIT 9.6 448 CHI-PIT 2.6
49 NYJ-PHI 21.3 149 ATL-CIN 16.7 249 SF-STL 13.1 349 CLE-DEN 9.5 449 PIT-SF 0.9
50 NO-STL 21.2 150 BUF-SF 16.7 250 KC-MIN 13 350 GB-SF 9.4 450 MIN-NYJ 0.8
51 DAL-PHI 21.1 151 CAR-DEN 16.7 251 CHI-MIN 13 351 GB-OAK 9.4 451 CLE-HOU 0.3
52 TB-WAS 21 152 BUF-STL 16.6 252 BUF-SD 13 352 CLE-MIN 9.3 452 MIA-NYJ 0.2
53 ARI-WAS 20.9 153 CAR-SEA 16.6 253 BUF-IND 13 353 BUF-KC 9.3 453 OAK-TB 0.2
54 MIN-TB 20.8 154 BAL-DAL 16.6 254 ARI-NYG 13 354 CLE-SD 9.2 454 BUF-WAS -0.8
55 DAL-DET 20.8 155 HOU-PHI 16.6 255 JAX-MIA 12.9 355 OAK-SEA 9.1 455 ATL-IND -1.3
56 SF-TB 20.7 156 NE-STL 16.5 256 DEN-MIN 12.8 356 HOU-MIN 9 456 BUF-PHI -1.8
57 SEA-TB 20.7 157 HOU-WAS 16.5 257 CLE-DAL 12.8 357 IND-PIT 9 457 MIA-MIN -2.3
58 NE-NO 20.6 158 KC-TB 16.5 258 IND-STL 12.8 358 CHI-TEN 9 458 DAL-STL -2.5
59 MIN-NE 20.5 159 DEN-PHI 16.5 259 IND-NYJ 12.8 359 IND-JAX 9 459 ATL-SF -2.8
60 ATL-PHI 20.5 160 CIN-WAS 16.4 260 DET-PHI 12.8 360 KC-STL 8.8 460 ATL-SD -3.1
61 CAR-SD 20.5 161 BAL-NYJ 16.3 261 NYJ-SF 12.8 361 OAK-WAS 8.8 461 CAR-MIN -3.5
62 JAX-NYG 20.5 162 NO-SF 16.2 262 PHI-SD 12.8 362 CIN-DET 8.7 462 NO-PIT -3.8
63 PIT-TB 20.4 163 TEN-WAS 16.2 263 DET-NYG 12.8 363 BAL-MIA 8.7 463 JAX-PHI -3.8
64 DAL-NYG 20.4 164 DAL-TEN 16.2 264 BAL-IND 12.7 364 IND-TEN 8.7 464 JAX-WAS -4.2
65 DEN-NO 20.2 165 PIT-WAS 16.1 265 ARI-MIN 12.7 365 DEN-HOU 8.7 465 NE-TEN -4.3
66 MIA-SF 20.2 166 MIA-OAK 16.1 266 CIN-IND 12.5 366 DET-SD 8.6 466 CLE-NO -4.4
67 DAL-HOU 20.2 167 BUF-TEN 16.1 267 HOU-TEN 12.5 367 BAL-GB 8.5 467 NYG-PIT -4.5
68 BAL-TB 20.2 168 NE-OAK 16 268 SEA-SF 12.5 368 CIN-SEA 8.3 468 OAK-STL -5.8
69 ARI-CAR 20.2 169 IND-MIN 16 269 JAX-MIN 12.5 369 JAX-KC 8.3 469 ARI-KC -5.8
70 MIN-PHI 20.2 170 BUF-DET 16 270 BUF-DEN 12.5 370 NE-PIT 8.3 470 BAL-DET -6
71 DET-NO 20.1 171 GB-NO 16 271 HOU-NYG 12.5 371 CIN-OAK 8.1 471 DAL-OAK -6.1
72 CHI-NYG 20.1 172 DEN-NYG 16 272 GB-KC 12.4 372 DEN-NE 8.1 472 BUF-JAX -6.3
73 MIA-NO 20 173 IND-WAS 16 273 NYG-SF 12.4 373 PHI-PIT 8.1 473 DET-SEA -6.5
74 NO-SEA 19.9 174 ATL-OAK 15.9 274 CLE-TEN 12.3 374 CLE-GB 7.9 474 ARI-SEA -6.6
75 CAR-TB 19.8 175 CHI-NE 15.9 275 CIN-NYJ 12.3 375 KC-MIA 7.9 475 CLE-NYG -7.8
76 ATL-SEA 19.8 176 NO-OAK 15.9 276 GB-MIA 12.3 376 KC-TEN 7.8 476 HOU-KC -8.1
77 CLE-TB 19.8 177 GB-NYG 15.9 277 BAL-SF 12.2 377 CLE-KC 7.8 477 CIN-GB -8.4
78 CAR-PIT 19.8 178 BUF-CLE 15.9 278 MIA-SEA 12.2 378 ARI-CLE 7.7 478 KC-SEA -8.4
79 MIN-NO 19.8 179 PHI-TEN 15.9 279 BAL-MIN 12.2 379 GB-JAX 7.7 479 ARI-BAL -8.6
80 JAX-NO 19.8 180 KC-NYJ 15.8 280 CHI-WAS 12.1 380 BAL-CHI 7.6 480 DET-KC -8.7
81 CHI-TB 19.8 181 KC-NO 15.8 281 MIA-TEN 12 381 CLE-IND 7.6 481 ARI-DET -8.7
82 NE-NYJ 19.8 182 CAR-OAK 15.7 282 CIN-SD 12 382 CHI-SD 7.6 482 BAL-HOU -8.8
83 CAR-GB 19.6 183 CIN-NYG 15.7 283 DAL-PIT 12 383 DET-TEN 7.5 483 BAL-KC -8.9
84 NO-TEN 19.5 184 BAL-NYG 15.7 284 NYG-SEA 12 384 CIN-PIT 7.5 484 CHI-DEN -9.1
85 IND-NO 19.5 185 GB-PHI 15.6 285 GB-MIN 12 385 CIN-JAX 7.5 485 BAL-SEA -9.3
86 DAL-GB 19.4 186 KC-WAS 15.5 286 DEN-SEA 12 386 JAX-OAK 7.5 486 DEN-GB -9.5
87 BAL-CAR 19.3 187 CAR-KC 15.5 287 CHI-NYJ 12 387 KC-OAK 7.4 487 CHI-GB -9.5
88 BUF-NYJ 19.3 188 SF-WAS 15.5 288 NYJ-PIT 12 388 KC-SD 7.4 488 DET-HOU -9.5
89 CAR-HOU 19.3 189 CLE-NYJ 15.5 289 DAL-SF 11.9 389 HOU-PIT 7.4 489 IND-SF -9.6
90 BUF-CAR 19.3 190 NYG-OAK 15.5 290 ATL-PIT 11.8 390 CLE-JAX 7.3 490 HOU-SEA -10.1
91 NYG-NYJ 19.3 191 KC-NE 15.4 291 MIA-PIT 11.8 391 PIT-TEN 7.3 491 IND-SD -10.1
92 ATL-STL 19.1 192 HOU-MIA 15.3 292 BAL-STL 11.7 392 SEA-TEN 7.3 492 CLE-PIT -10.5
93 TB-TEN 19.1 193 NE-NYG 15.3 293 GB-SEA 11.7 393 DEN-JAX 7.2 493 CIN-DEN -11.7
94 DAL-SEA 19.1 194 ARI-PHI 15.3 294 CHI-PHI 11.6 394 DEN-OAK 7.2 494 ARI-HOU -11.8
95 ARI-NO 19 195 BUF-MIN 15.3 295 NYJ-TEN 11.6 395 BAL-OAK 7.1 495 CHI-CIN -12.7
96 MIN-NYG 18.8 196 DAL-WAS 15.2 296 MIN-TEN 11.5 396 CHI-CLE 7.1 496 SD-SF -13
97 ATL-GB 18.7 197 ATL-HOU 15.2 297 GB-TEN 11.5 397 HOU-IND 7      
98 ATL-MIA 18.7 198 MIN-STL 15.2 298 KC-SF 11.5 398 DEN-SF 7      
99 ATL-JAX 18.7 199 KC-NYG 15.2 299 OAK-PHI 11.5 399 DEN-PIT 7      
100 ATL-NYJ 18.7 200 DEN-MIA 15.1 300 CLE-MIA 11.5 400 KC-PIT 6.9      

A Ryan/Griffin combination doesn't work for a few reasons: one, Ryan has an ADP of QB8, and two, a combination of Ryan and RG3 means you are going to play Ryan almost every week.  Instead, there are two combinations I want to highlight, and both feature the number one pick in the 2015 Draft.

Jameis Winston/Sam Bradford is the ideal QBBC if you're a traditionalist who loves to wait on the quarterback position.  They offer fantastic upside and value, given that Winston has an ADP of QB19 and Bradford is just one spot ahead of him.  However, if you want a safer floor -- and I can understand that some of you would -- then I can recommend a Winston/Eli Manning pair.  Here's the thing: After the top 8 of Andrew Luck, Aaron Rodgers, Peyton Manning, Russell Wilson, Drew Brees, Ben Roethlisberger, Cam Newton, and Ryan, the next set of quarterbacks can go in pretty much any order.  In some leagues, Eli Manning will be the 9th guy off the board; in others, he might still be around after 12 quarterbacks have been taken.  So if you're in a league where Eli Manning falls out of the top 12, I'd be inclined to take him as the 13th quarterback off the board.

But if your draft doesn't unfold that way, then go with a Winston/Bradford pairing. You can wait a very long time to take these two, which means the rest of your roster should be excellent.  And here is the schedule you would be rewarded with:

  • Week 1: Bradford @ Atlanta Falcons (Monday Night Football)
  • Week 2: Winston @ New Orleans Saints
  • Week 3: Winston @ Houston Texans
  • Week 4: Bradford @ Washington Redskins
  • Week 5: Winston vs. Jacksonville Jaguars
  • Week 6: Bradford vs. New York Giants (Monday Night Football)
  • Week 7: Winston @ Washington Redskins
  • Week 8: Winston @ Atlanta Falcons
  • Week 9: Winston vs. New York Giants
  • Week 10: Winston vs. Dallas Cowboys
  • Week 11: Winston @ Philadelphia Eagles (or Bradford vs. Tampa Bay)
  • Week 12: Winston @ Indianapolis Colts
  • Week 13: Winston vs. Atlanta Falcons
  • Week 14: Winston vs. New Orleans Saints
  • Week 15: Bradford vs. Arizona Cardinals
  • Week 16: Bradford vs. Washington Redskins (Saturday Night)

This schedule features three games against a Washington defense that's projected to be the worst in the league, including the all-important week 16 game.  It also has three games against a porous Atlanta defense, any of which could turn into a shootout.  You get two games each against the Giants and Saints, teams that are much more titled towards offense than defense, along with games against the Colts, Eagles, Cowboys, Jaguars, Cardinals, and Texans. This is an incredibly enticing schedule, one that can make you feel confident to wait until 15 quarterbacks are off the board before you take your first.

With Bradford, the upside is obvious: over the last two years (i.e., during the Chip Kelly Era), the Eagles quarterbacks rank 4th in fantasy points scored.  And while we may not be able to count on Bradford to put up fantastic numbers every week, there's no reason he can't be successful against some of the worst defenses in the NFL.

For Winston, some of you may need more convincing, but I refer you again to that schedule. The Bucs are going to lean on Winston, as the team's running game is below-average. As a result, Winston should be forced to pass, and even if he struggles with interceptions as a rookie, he could wind up with a significant amount of garbage time points against teams like Indianapolis, New Orleans, Atlanta, and Dallas. With Vincent Jackson, Mike Evans, and Austin Seferian-Jenkins, Winston has the weapons around him to succeed as a rookie against the easiest schedule in the NFL.

Of course, if you don't want Winston and Bradford (or Manning), you can scan the table above and find how any other pair of schedules interact.  That's why I present the full table.

Picking Just One Quarterback? 

Even if you don't believe in committees, or have no preset draft plan, it pays to know how tough of a schedule each team has. So let's close with a look at the quarterbacks with the easiest schedules. In leagues with small rosters, it's difficult to go QBBC, so it's helpful to know which quarterbacks have the easiest (Winston) and toughest (poor, poor Browns fans) schedules.

RkTmSOSRkTmSOS
1 TB 16.7 17 TEN -1.3
2 NO 13.2 18 GB -3.1
3 CAR 11.4 19 ARI -3.1
4 ATL 10.9 20 STL -3.3
5 NYJ 7.5 21 DET -4
6 WAS 6.7 22 KC -4.1
7 PHI 6.2 23 DEN -4.1
8 NYG 4.4 24 HOU -4.6
9 DAL 3.4 25 BAL -4.8
10 BUF 2.7 26 CIN -5.6
11 MIN 2.2 27 OAK -6.3
12 NE 0.7 28 SD -6.3
13 MIA 0.4 29 SF -6.6
14 JAX 0.2 30 CHI -7.1
15 IND -0.1 31 PIT -8.3
16 SEA -1.3 32 CLE -10.1

Winston's schedule is great, but as you can see, the top four schedules all come from the NFC South: that division gets to play each other, the NFC East, and the AFC South, which is quite the tasty lineup.  Meanwhile, all four AFC North teams are in the bottom eight, with the Steelers and Browns getting the toughest schedules for fantasy quarterbacks among the group.

Photos provided by Imagn Images