Mastering Salary Cap Drafts: Part 5, Bidding Strategies

Note: This series is designed to take salary cap drafters of any ability and refine their skills to those of a seasoned veteran. The articles will go from simple concepts to the most advanced salary cap draft theories. Each article is designed to build on the previous articles in the series. For best results, read each article before proceeding to the concepts in the next article.

If you haven't yet, it's a good idea to go back and read the first four parts of this series before you dive into bidding strategies.

Part 1, Beginner Mistakes
Part 2, Attacking Novice Draft Rooms
Part 3, Preparation
Part 4, Nomination Strategies

After Part 4 told you how to craft your nomination strategy, you can now work on what to do once the player is out there. There isn't as much nuance in your bidding strategies as there is when picking a player to nominate, but there are still some things you can do to try and maximize your value when bidding.

As a general rule, the best way to avoid a big mistake from a poor bid in a salary cap draft is to not get fancy. While you are getting comfortable with the other drafters, their tendencies, and the unique process of a salary cap draft, you should follow the simple rule of bidding one dollar more than the previous bid. Your goal is to take as much guesswork off your plate as you can, and trying to craft the perfect bid every time you're in the middle of a bidding war is sure to lead to mistakes until you are a veteran salary cap drafter.

The salary cap draft landscape is full of examples of drafters getting caught up in the flow of bidding on an elite player and losing money with a poor bid. When the name Justin Jefferson is called out for $20, there will invariably be bids that proceed in $5 or $10 increments. It's easy to see the bids climb quickly at that pace – "25..30..35..40..45…55" – and at some point, the bidding will slow down. What you don't want is to be the one who yells, "$55!" and the room goes silent. Perhaps on Jefferson, that number will be $55+ this year, and you'll be fine with it, but you'll never know if you could've got him cheaper. If you jump $5 and everyone stops bidding, then you've stopped them in their tracks for one of two reasons: You got a deal because you blew everyone away with your bid, or you wasted money. Sometimes it's hard to tell which is which. Don't waste your money by guessing.

Here are some other things to think about when it comes to bidding in your salary cap drafts.

Have a Reason

Too many salary cap drafters get into the habit of throwing out bids on players they like without thinking about how it furthers their goals in the draft. It is imperative to always have a reason for bidding. Of course, you want to bid on a player you like, but if that's your only reason, that's not sound salary cap draft strategy. You should ask yourself the following questions before you bid:

• Do I need this player, or do I want this player?
• Do I have the salary cap to pay for the player while sticking to my strategy?
• How many roster spots do I have left, and how will landing this player affect my future in the draft?
• Is the player cheap enough that you can't pass up a bid?
• Is the player expensive, but you need the player bad enough that you have to bid?

Two factors exist that have a push-and-pull relationship with each other. On one side is the price of the player and on the other is your current team need. Sometimes this produces some odd results when you go through these questions, but they are important. For example, if you already have your top three wide receivers for your team and Mike Evans comes up for bid, you are somewhat limited in what you can do. If the Evans bidding stops at $9, you have to weigh whether or not that is cheap enough to bid or whether you have to pass on the deal. The unfortunate side effect of going through this sequence of questions is that you will have to pass on some deals along the way. You simply can't buy every player who goes cheaper than they should. There are plenty of managers who can't pass up a deal, and they'll get stuck with a lot of decent players for solid prices, but it hems them in at the end of the draft. This often leads to a roster that is unexciting and that fills up before it should.

So all you have to do to avoid that trap is to juxtapose your need against the price of the player. If Evans is about to go for $3, or $21, the decision is much easier. You can't afford to pass on him for the former price, and you can't afford to bid on him for the latter. But when it's somewhere in the middle, you have to look at price versus need while not forgetting that part of that equation is how many roster spots you have left. It can be a complicated formula that you have to assess in the middle of a bidding war, but you can train yourself to quickly run through those concepts by deliberately paying attention to these principles as you draft. It takes time and repetition, but anyone can learn.

Price Enforcing Vs. Bidding People Up

It is tempting to equate these two things, but they are quite different. But before discussing how they're different, there is an important caveat. Trying to run up the price on a player either because the price is just too low or because you think you can squeeze more money from someone is risky, and it can ruin your draft. Plain and simple. To do either one effectively, you need to have a strong grasp on the managers in the room, the scoring system, expected prices, and a whole list of other little things that allow you to bid with the expectation that you aren't going to get stuck with a player. Be careful.

But if you feel comfortable doing it, one of these is inherently less risky than the other. Price enforcing is the process of bidding on a player that has stalled out well below his expected price. When you decide to bid in this situation, you are essentially saying that you are ok if you end up with the player. For example, people are bidding on Najee Harris, and his price stalls out at $19. Because of his disappointing 2022 season, most managers are not that excited about him, and as a result, you're sitting in the draft and realize his price is cratering. You hadn't planned on landing Harris but bidding $20 is less about trying to land him and more about making sure his price gets closer to what should be his market value. If you happen to get "stuck" with Harris for a price between $20 and $25, you are still getting a nice deal. But, more than likely, you can stop bidding in the low-to-mid $20s and let someone else have him. But you pulled an extra $5-$6 out of the room by getting his price up closer to where it should be. That matters in the long run if you consistently enforce market value as the draft goes on.

Bidding someone up solely because you believe that the other manager will keep bidding and you can squeeze more money from them is a completely different concept. In this situation, often, you are simply reading the player and their roster for how much they are willing to pay. If someone doesn't have their top receiver and Chris Olave is the only one left in the top 20, you can explore the idea of making them pay a few more dollars than they should. Olave goes for around $24 in salary cap drafts, so when the bidding stops at $22, you have a chance to squeeze that player for a few more dollars. Trying to get the other manager to pay $28-$30 is probably too risky, but sometimes scarcity inflation will allow it. Instead, take some of the risk out and just concentrate on pulling two more bids. When you bid $23 and then $25, you are done. Hopefully, they say $26, and you have effectively cost them $4. It doesn't seem like a lot at the time, but doing that over and over during the draft has a cumulative impact that you will notice.

Part 6 of this series will focus on some human psychology and tells in a draft room, but to successfully pull off price enforcing or bidding someone up, you have to know the fantasy angle, the human angle, and the salary cap strategy angle.

Three Final Moves

Bidding is more of an art form than something you can nail down with specific linear thoughts. You can rarely say, "Well, if they do this, I'll do this," because so much of what happens in a salary cap room is not the same in any other room. You have to adjust as you go. Learning as many moves as possible and then mixing them up is important to get the best results. Here are a few final moves to consider adding to your salary cap tool belt.

• Bidding more than $1 – Yes, there are moments when you want to bid more than $1 over the previous bid. There is a psychological barrier to crossing over certain price points. When the bidding slows at $27, you can often say $30 and win the contest right there, whereas going by $1 increments allow your opponent to get comfortable with paying in the $30s for a player they had pegged in the $20s. Crossing the $20, $30, $40, and $50 barriers is a psychological hurdle people must get over to continue to bid. If they're on the fence, it might be the final thing causing them to stop bidding. Furthermore, if you sense a drafter seems unsure with their last bid, then jumping the bid by $2 or $3 will sometimes end the fight and thereby save you a couple of bucks.
• Quick Bidding – If you know what your bid limit is in your head when a player is nominated, it is a good idea to get into the habit of bidding quickly. Following an opponent's bid with a quick $1 jump has two effects on them. One effect is that your quick bid makes it harder for others to determine when you'll stop. If you go more slowly when you're nearing your limit, they'll get a quick read on your intentions. The second effect is that it will discourage others from bidding. Your quick bids will show confidence and a willingness to continue to bid. They won't know when you will suddenly stop, and your show of confidence sometimes buys you a few dollars off the price. There is another beneficial side effect of bidding quickly. It allows you to keep the pressure on the other player when you're the one with the winning bid. If you give them time to breathe, they get extra time to think and decide if they want to bid again. Don't give them that luxury. Keep the pressure on and see if you can force them to make mistakes as a result of your quick bids.
• Cap Awareness – Keeping track of every single manager's cap situation during a draft is something that isn't optional if you expect to grow as a salary cap drafter. You simply cannot be aware of what to do in your draft if you don't know every single person's exact dollar available. You will often see a situation where you and another drafter have just a few dollars left, and many times they won't be aware of the cap situation, so they'll stop bidding right before you would have hit your max. Or they don't realize what you need on your team, and they let you have the player you desperately needed for the price you needed them for because they aren't aware of the cap dollars. Make sure you aren't making similar mistakes by keeping immaculate records. After all, how can you bid if you don't know what you and your opponent can bid with?

Conclusion

None of these ideas by themselves are going to win the day, but they are important in the nuanced jungle of a salary cap draft. Your ability to employ one or several of them during the draft will have a cumulative effect as the draft wears on. There are no magic pills in a salary cap draft room, and when you are playing with people who have done a lot of them, your edge will be small. But learning all these tactics and then combining them as they become appropriate can push your edge, and that is what you need to win your draft.