This article is taken from the 2023 Footballguys Best Ball Guide. To download the full 60+ page guide for free, click here.
Also, note that the principles, while specifically written here for Best Ball leagues, can also be applied to your regular redraft leagues.
Against the Grain
Zero WR has become the black sheep of fantasy football drafting strategies. The premise of the process is that you do not draft any wide receivers until the middle rounds, giving yourself an advantage at the running back position while hopefully locking up elite quarterbacks and tight ends. Historically, there are archetypes of receivers to target in the middle rounds that will likely break out and give you WR1 production. Typically, you want to target young and ascending players with a path to lead their team in targets. In 2021, Stefon Diggs, Calvin Ridley, DK Metcalf, Justin Jefferson, Tyler Lockett, and Adam Thielen all finished inside the top 12 despite being drafted outside the fourth round. In 2022, Jaylen Waddle, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Amari Cooper, DeVonta Smith, and Christian Kirk followed suit.
Of course, by utilizing this strategy, you are missing out on the surefire WR1s early in the draft. Last year, eight of the top 10 wide receivers in preseason ADP finished inside the top 10. Mike Evans and Deebo Samuel were the only exceptions. Evans had a historically inefficient season by his standards. Samuel was on-pace for a top-10 finish before a midseason trade for Christian McCaffrey. As a collective, the fantasy football industry is pretty sharp at projecting wide receiver output and not quite as good at predicting running backs.
But when others zig, you can zag. Especially in Best Ball drafts, there is a trend of drafting wide receivers early. Not having to make start/sit decisions in Best Ball makes the weekly volatility of wide receivers more appealing. The weekly volume and consistency of running backs make them more desirable in managed leagues. Additionally, with the inability to use waivers, an injury to an early-round running back could be detrimental to your Best Ball season. Running backs, naturally, tend to get injured more frequently.
The Argument for Zero WR
This guide aims to give you the pros and cons of every strategy to help you make an informed decision.
The main argument for drafting Zero WR is that the bellcow running back is starting to dissipate from the NFL. In the 1990s, over half of the teams had a running back who would eclipse 250 carries each year. On average, about two running backs per year would see over 350 carries. However, since 2010, the number of 250-carry rushers has been nearly cut in half. Since 2015, Derrick Henry is the only player to exceed 350 carries in a single season, and he only did it once.
NFL teams are starting to understand the benefits of having a stable of running backs to deploy with individual strengths and weaknesses. Bill Belichick began this philosophy a while back, which sparked the "avoid Patriots running backs" narrative. But since then, more and more teams are starting to lean on a committee. It keeps legs fresh and decreases the risk of injury while allowing each back to play to his physical strengths. Gone are the days of a running back staying on the field for 90% of his team’s snaps. We’ll typically see a team roster with an early-down grinder, a change-of-pace back, a passing-down specialist, and, occasionally, the dreaded goal-line vulture. The uptick in rushing quarterbacks also limits the ceiling for that team’s running backs.
Because of these reasons, Zero WR isn’t as valuable of a strategy as it used to be. You’re giving up elite production at the wide receiver position for a position with a higher frequency of injury which scores fewer points. 2022 had a handful of early-round running backs who hit: Austin Ekeler, Christian McCaffrey, and Derrick Henry, most notably. But along with those hits came misses like Jonathan Taylor, Najee Harris, Joe Mixon, D’Andre Swift, Alvin Kamara, and Javonte Williams. Last year’s league-winners were Josh Jacobs, Tony Pollard, Rhamondre Stevenson, and Jamaal Williams. All running backs who were pushed way down draft boards. The frequency of injuries opens up opportunities for other players, and the inability to project rushing touchdowns gives us late-round surprises every season.
Conclusion
In summary, we are better at projecting season-long wide receiver output than running backs. Typically, the hit rate for a wide receiver drafted in the early rounds is significantly higher than a running back’s. Elite running backs provide a smaller advantage over replacement-level players than those at other positions. Factoring in the injury frequency for running backs makes them a risky asset for investing precious early-round picks. That’s not to say that building a Zero WR team can’t be successful. But it’s a high-risk strategy that doesn’t necessarily translate to a higher ceiling.
- We are better at projecting WR production than RB production
- RBs are more likely to get injured, making the position more volatile
- Having elite WRs, QBs, and TEs can cover up a weak RB room
- Zero WR is less than optimal unless your early-round RBs stay healthy
For more Best Ball content, download our free 2023 Best Ball Guide. We'll update after the NFL schedule release with information on correlating playoff matchups and navigating through bye weeks. An ELITE subscription will include future versions of our guide.
- 60+ pages
- 10 Draft strategies
- Underdog Fantasy promos
- Rankings from our Best Ball experts
- Tools to help you win
- Valuable to new users and seasoned vets
Download The 2023 Footballguys Best Ball Guide here!
And if you're new to Best Ball, play with our friends at Underdog Fantasy.
But before you do, here's a way to double your money. Sign up for Underdog Fantasy with this link or promo code FOOTBALLGUYS and get a 100% deposit match up to $100. Seriously, they'll match your deposit.